PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWX vs. DFAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWX vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RWX vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-2.64%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-15.73%
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
3.85%1.31%5.25%11.04%-14.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 3.85% return.


RWX

1D
1.69%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-1.06%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
0.75%

DFAR

1D
0.38%
1M
-6.26%
YTD
3.85%
6M
1.19%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWX vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RWX vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWX vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWXDFARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.18

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

0.35

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.24

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

0.93

+3.69

RWX vs. DFAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the DFAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWX and DFAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWXDFARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.18

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.07

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RWX and DFAR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RWX vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison

RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DFAR's 2.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.75%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.97%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RWX vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and DFAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RWXDFARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.62%

-32.27%

-41.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-12.10%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.14%

-6.40%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.37%

-14.75%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.15%

+0.05%

Volatility

RWX vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) at 4.52%. This indicates that RWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RWXDFARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

4.52%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.27%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

16.03%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

19.31%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

19.31%

-2.89%