RWSIX vs. EQCHX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX).

RWSIX is managed by Redwood. It was launched on Nov 1, 2017. EQCHX is managed by AXS. It was launched on Sep 10, 2012.

Performance

RWSIX vs. EQCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RWSIX vs. EQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	-1.83%	-2.43%	-0.64%	8.92%	-6.10%	18.37%	22.40%	11.18%	-3.55%	-6.27%
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.83%	-8.09%	-3.79%	-8.07%	20.13%	12.28%	6.96%	-2.56%	-12.91%	6.76%

Returns By Period

RWSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.37%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: -1.31%
• 1Y: -1.07%
• 3Y*: -0.39%
• 5Y*: 1.20%
• 10Y*: —

EQCHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWSIX vs. EQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EQCHX's 1.91% expense ratio.

EQCHX

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

RWSIX

Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund

Return for Risk

RWSIX vs. EQCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWSIX

RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWSIX vs. EQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWSIX	EQCHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWSIX	EQCHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between RWSIX and EQCHX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RWSIX vs. EQCHX - Dividend Comparison

RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, while EQCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	4.59%	4.51%	0.00%	10.35%	3.41%	7.81%	7.78%	3.05%	2.51%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.82%	1.54%	20.40%	0.00%	3.86%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RWSIX	EQCHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.29%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RWSIX	EQCHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.44%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.26%	—	—