PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWSIX vs. PQTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWSIX
Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund
-1.83%-2.43%-0.64%8.92%-6.10%18.37%22.40%11.18%-3.55%-6.27%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
4.61%2.41%-3.08%-4.21%11.37%14.83%9.72%2.83%2.30%1.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWSIX achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than PQTPX's 4.61% return.


RWSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
-1.07%
3Y*
-0.39%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*

PQTPX

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
4.61%
6M
10.33%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
2.06%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
3.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RWSIX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWSIX
RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTPX
PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWSIXPQTPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

1.39

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.03

1.89

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.25

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

1.54

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

3.74

-4.22

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWSIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the PQTPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWSIX and PQTPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWSIXPQTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

1.39

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.44

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between RWSIX and PQTPX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison

RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, while PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWSIX
Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund
4.59%4.51%0.00%10.35%3.41%7.81%7.78%3.05%2.51%0.63%0.00%0.00%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.80%2.40%5.63%2.49%0.32%0.20%0.00%7.57%

Drawdowns

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWSIX drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum PQTPX drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWSIX and PQTPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RWSIXPQTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-27.86%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.02%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-27.86%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.29%

-12.70%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-9.37%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

3.30%

+1.14%

Volatility

RWSIX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison

Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) at 3.61%. This indicates that RWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RWSIXPQTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.61%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

6.68%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

8.73%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.09%

9.86%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.26%

9.36%

+2.90%