RWSIX vs. QMHNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RWSIX (Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund) and QMHNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 5 years, RWSIX returned 2.07%/yr vs 16.77%/yr for QMHNX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. RWSIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for QMHNX.

Performance

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWSIX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 15.24% return.

RWSIX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 14.78%
• 3Y*: 2.78%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: —

QMHNX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 6M: 16.15%
• 1Y: 33.76%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: 4.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	7.58%	-2.43%	-0.64%	8.92%	-6.10%	18.37%	22.40%	11.18%	-3.55%	-6.27%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	15.24%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RWSIX and QMHNX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017	-0.02

Return for Risk

RWSIX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWSIX

RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 87
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWSIX	QMHNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.65	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.42	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	7.15	-5.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	20.60	-13.98

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWSIX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWSIX drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWSIX and QMHNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWSIX	QMHNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-40.29%	+15.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.37%	-4.81%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.90%	-19.23%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.90%	-19.23%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.45%	-3.14%	-7.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.83%	-18.21%	+11.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.66%	+0.66%

Volatility

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) is 3.73%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that RWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWSIX	QMHNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	4.02%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.97%	9.87%	-0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	13.01%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.25%	17.26%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.31%	15.45%	-3.14%

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWSIX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than QMHNX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.64%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	4.19%	4.51%	0.00%	10.35%	3.41%	7.81%	7.78%	3.05%	2.51%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWSIX and QMHNX in my portfolio?

RWSIX and QMHNX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWSIX or QMHNX?

QMHNX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to RWSIX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWSIX dropped -24.90% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.