EQCHX vs. QMHNX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX).

EQCHX is managed by AXS. It was launched on Sep 10, 2012. QMHNX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Jul 16, 2013.

Performance

EQCHX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQCHX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.83%	-8.09%	-3.79%	-8.07%	20.13%	12.28%	6.96%	-2.56%	-12.91%	15.11%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	13.82%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	-2.06%

Returns By Period

EQCHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMHNX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 13.82%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 25.90%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCHX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCHX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.

QMHNX

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N

EQCHX

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Return for Risk

EQCHX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 85
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCHX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQCHX	QMHNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.35	—

Correlation

The correlation between EQCHX and QMHNX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EQCHX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

EQCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.82%	1.54%	20.40%	0.00%	3.86%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.66%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCHX	QMHNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-40.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.23%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.52%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EQCHX	QMHNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.17%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.46%	—