PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 5.69%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


RWR

1D
0.93%
1M
3.35%
YTD
16.67%
6M
16.81%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
5.69%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
2.90%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
47.99%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
16.67%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and VGT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between RWR and VGT has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RWR vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWR
VGT

Real Estate

98.6%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
0.5%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Technology

-

98.5%

Real Estate

RWR
98.6%
VGT

-

Financial Services

RWR
0.0%
VGT
0.5%

Utilities

RWR
0.0%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

RWR

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

RWR

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RWR

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

RWR

-

VGT

-

Energy

RWR

-

VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

RWR

-

VGT
0.0%

Industrials

RWR

-

VGT
0.4%

Technology

RWR

-

VGT
98.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWRVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.94

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

9.11

-0.64

RWR vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWR vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-54.63%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-16.40%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-27.23%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-35.07%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-35.07%

-9.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.18%

+7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-7.95%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

5.28%

-2.92%

Volatility

RWR vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.93%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

10.00%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

18.00%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

22.00%

-8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

25.40%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

24.72%

-3.20%

RWR vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWR vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.27%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and VGT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to RWR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while VGT is Technology Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer