PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed USL with an annualized return of 5.39%, while USL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.


RWR

1D
1.38%
1M
0.75%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.45%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
5.39%

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
12.61%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and USL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.16

The correlation between RWR and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWR vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWR
USL

Real Estate

98.6%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
4.5%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

RWR
98.6%
USL

-

Financial Services

RWR
0.0%
USL
4.5%

Utilities

RWR
0.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

RWR

-

USL

-

Communication Services

RWR

-

USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RWR

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

RWR

-

USL

-

Energy

RWR

-

USL

-

Healthcare

RWR

-

USL

-

Industrials

RWR

-

USL

-

Technology

RWR

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWRUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.39

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

6.85

+0.32

RWR vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWRUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.99

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.57

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.01

+0.31

Drawdowns

RWR vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-89.06%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-16.76%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-23.33%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-33.82%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-66.02%

+21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-39.10%

+37.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-61.45%

+48.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

8.27%

-5.90%

Volatility

RWR vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.29%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

10.57%

-6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

23.34%

-13.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

28.59%

-15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

30.09%

-11.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

32.34%

-10.83%

RWR vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWR vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.39%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and USL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to RWR (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.57% vs 5.39% for RWR. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while USL is Oil & Gas. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer