PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. VRAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWO vs. VRAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than VRAI's 22.22% return.


RWO

1D
0.18%
1M
1.61%
6M
10.03%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
3.54%
ALL TIME*
4.08%

VRAI

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.17%
6M
11.88%
YTD
22.22%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.32M$9.03M$5.39M
$51.80K$42.80K$47.62K

RWO vs. VRAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
15.09%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%9.43%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
22.22%6.67%2.66%6.12%-9.96%24.35%-5.94%6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and VRAI is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.73

The correlation between RWO and VRAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWO vs. VRAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VRAI
VRAI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VRAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VRAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRAI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWO vs. VRAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWOVRAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

5.24

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

16.38

-8.35

RWO vs. VRAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the VRAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and VRAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWO vs. VRAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than VRAI's maximum drawdown of -47.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and VRAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWOVRAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-47.51%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-4.82%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-16.89%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-26.71%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-2.45%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-9.89%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.54%

+0.89%

Volatility

RWO vs. VRAI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI) at 2.89%. This indicates that RWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWOVRAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.89%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

8.01%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

11.78%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.53%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

21.94%

-3.73%

RWO vs. VRAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VRAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWO vs. VRAI - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than VRAI's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.14%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
2.87%4.68%7.13%5.02%4.48%3.34%3.91%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWO and VRAI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWO has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to VRAI (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs VRAI's -47.51%.

On 5-year performance, VRAI leads with 6.14% vs 2.48% for RWO. On fees, RWO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VRAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VRAI has performed better with a 6.14% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for VRAI.

RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.87% for VRAI.

RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while VRAI tracks Indxx Real Asset Income Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.55% for VRAI.

VRAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWO and VRAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer