RWO vs. IQRA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and IQRA (IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF) are both REIT funds. RWO is passively managed, while IQRA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWO returned 9.49%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for IQRA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IQRA.

Performance

RWO vs. IQRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF (IQRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than IQRA's 5.98% return.

RWO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 9.49%
• 5Y*: 1.93%
• 10Y*: 3.42%

IQRA

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 11.28%
• 3Y*: 9.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. IQRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	7.94%	8.87%	1.76%	7.98%
IQRA IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF	5.98%	12.42%	5.58%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and IQRA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.91

The correlation between RWO and IQRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWO vs. IQRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWO	IQRA
Real Estate	89.3%	51.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	1.4%
Financial Services	0.8%	2.2%
Technology	0.7%	-
Healthcare	0.4%	-
Energy	0.3%	6.5%
Industrials	0.2%	12.6%
Utilities	0.0%	28.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

RWO vs. IQRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO

RWO Risk / Return Rank: 29
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

IQRA

IQRA Risk / Return Rank: 29
IQRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IQRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IQRA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
IQRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
IQRA Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. IQRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF (IQRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWO	IQRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.08	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.51	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	4.92	+0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWO vs. IQRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the IQRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and IQRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWO	IQRA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.08	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.67	-0.51

Drawdowns

RWO vs. IQRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than IQRA's maximum drawdown of -15.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and IQRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWO	IQRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-15.70%	-51.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-8.01%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.66%	-15.70%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-5.02%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.68%	-3.15%	-9.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.30%	+0.15%

Volatility

RWO vs. IQRA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF (IQRA) at 3.42%. This indicates that RWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWO	IQRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.42%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	8.22%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	10.53%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	12.86%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	12.86%	+5.35%

RWO vs. IQRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IQRA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWO vs. IQRA - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than IQRA's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQRA IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF	2.81%	2.83%	3.53%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	3.35%	3.62%	3.68%	3.53%	3.69%	2.79%	3.25%	3.97%	3.90%	3.26%	3.77%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWO and IQRA in my portfolio?

RWO and IQRA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWO or IQRA?

RWO has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IQRA (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs IQRA's -15.70%.

Which ETF is better, RWO or IQRA?

On 3-year performance, IQRA leads with 9.89% vs 9.49% for RWO. On fees, RWO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQRA has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWO or IQRA?

Over the 3-year period, IQRA has performed better with a 9.89% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWO or IQRA?

RWO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWO or IQRA?

RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.81% for IQRA.

What is the main difference between RWO and IQRA?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.65% for IQRA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.