RWO vs. DTCR
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both REIT funds - RWO tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index while DTCR tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWO returned 1.93%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for DTCR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
RWO vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.
RWO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
RWO vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 7.94% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | 17.43% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and DTCR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RWO and DTCR has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RWO vs. DTCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWO
DTCR
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
RWO
DTCR
Consumer Cyclical
RWO
DTCR
-
Financial Services
RWO
DTCR
-
Technology
RWO
DTCR
Healthcare
RWO
DTCR
-
Energy
RWO
DTCR
-
Industrials
RWO
DTCR
-
Utilities
RWO
DTCR
-
Basic Materials
RWO
-
DTCR
-
Communication Services
RWO
-
DTCR
Consumer Defensive
RWO
-
DTCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
DTCR
RWO vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWO | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.61 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 6.61 | -5.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 20.78 | -15.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWO | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 3.90 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.72 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.76 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
RWO vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -38.98% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -12.89% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -24.96% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -38.98% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.74% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -12.37% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 4.09% | -1.64% |
Volatility
RWO vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 3.93%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 7.16% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 16.92% | -7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 21.84% | -9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 21.83% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 21.90% | -3.69% |
RWO vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RWO and DTCR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
RWO vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.35% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWO and DTCR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to RWO (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 15.53% vs 1.93% for RWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, RWO has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 1.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWO and DTCR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.
RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer