RWO vs. DFGR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. RWO is passively managed, while DFGR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWO returned 11.85%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for DFGR. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGR.

Performance

RWO vs. DFGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than DFGR's 10.41% return.

RWO

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 11.85%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 3.88%

DFGR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 11.18%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. DFGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	11.44%	8.87%	1.76%	10.91%	-1.35%
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	10.41%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and DFGR is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.97

The correlation between RWO and DFGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RWO vs. DFGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO

RWO Risk / Return Rank: 34
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 27
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. DFGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWO	DFGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.92	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.32	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.23	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	4.32	+1.71

RWO vs. DFGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the DFGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and DFGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWO vs. DFGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than DFGR's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and DFGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWO	DFGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-21.28%	-46.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-9.15%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.66%	-17.57%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.42%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-6.22%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	2.59%	-0.12%

Volatility

RWO vs. DFGR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) at 4.22%. This indicates that RWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWO	DFGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	4.22%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	9.34%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	12.29%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	15.42%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	15.42%	+2.79%

RWO vs. DFGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGR's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWO vs. DFGR - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than DFGR's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.85%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	3.24%	3.62%	3.68%	3.53%	3.69%	2.79%	3.25%	3.97%	3.90%	3.26%	3.77%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWO and DFGR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, RWO and DFGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RWO or DFGR?

RWO has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to DFGR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs DFGR's -21.28%.

Which ETF is better, RWO or DFGR?

On 3-year performance, RWO leads with 11.85% vs 11.14% for DFGR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWO or DFGR?

Over the 3-year period, RWO has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWO or DFGR?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWO or DFGR?

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.24% for RWO.

What is the main difference between RWO and DFGR?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.22% for DFGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.