RWM vs. PLTZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. RWM is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, RWM returned -27.19% vs -35.88% for PLTZ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.

Performance

RWM vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 48.68% return.

RWM

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: -16.29%
• 6M: -14.25%
• 1Y: -27.19%
• 3Y*: -13.21%
• 5Y*: -5.30%
• 10Y*: -12.35%

PLTZ

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: 22.41%
• YTD: 48.68%
• 6M: 76.10%
• 1Y: -35.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWM vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000	-16.29%	-14.31%
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF	48.68%	-67.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and PLTZ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

RWM vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWM

RWM Risk / Return Rank: 0
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 0

PLTZ

PLTZ Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PLTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWM vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWM	PLTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.39	-0.35	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.01	0.11	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.01	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-0.53	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.74	-0.70	-1.04

RWM vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the PLTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and PLTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWM vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and PLTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWM	PLTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.58%	-72.51%	-23.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.70%	-67.51%	+39.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.54%	-51.04%	-44.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.08%	-55.64%	-18.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.76%	51.01%	-35.25%

Volatility

RWM vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 6.51%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) has a volatility of 39.87%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWM	PLTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	39.87%	-33.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.28%	76.47%	-62.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.61%	102.92%	-83.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.64%	101.96%	-79.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.14%	101.96%	-78.82%

RWM vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWM vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000	4.24%	3.97%	6.03%	4.78%	0.39%	0.00%	0.20%	1.55%	0.87%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWM and PLTZ in my portfolio?

RWM and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWM or PLTZ?

PLTZ has higher volatility (39.87%) compared to RWM (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.58% vs PLTZ's -72.51%.

Which ETF is better, RWM or PLTZ?

On 1-year performance, RWM leads with -27.19% vs -35.88% for PLTZ. On fees, RWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RWM has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWM or PLTZ?

Over the 1-year period, RWM has performed better with a -27.19% return vs -35.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWM or PLTZ?

RWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWM or PLTZ?

RWM has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.

What is the main difference between RWM and PLTZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RWM and 1.29% for PLTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.