PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RWM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RWM vs. SPY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 (-100%), while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWM returned -12.42%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. RWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.

Performance

RWM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -12.42%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.

RWM

1D
-0.81%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
-14.47%
1Y
-28.68%
3Y*
-13.46%
5Y*
-5.74%
10Y*
-12.42%

SPY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000		-17.02%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-17.90%-31.04%-19.83%11.57%-13.61%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF		9.74%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and SPY is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007

-0.85

The correlation between RWM and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RWM
SPY

Financial Services

96.0%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.0%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

RWM
96.0%
SPY
11.1%

Basic Materials

RWM

-

SPY
1.7%

Communication Services

RWM

-

SPY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RWM

-

SPY
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

RWM

-

SPY
4.5%

Energy

RWM

-

SPY
3.1%

Healthcare

RWM

-

SPY
8.3%

Industrials

RWM

-

SPY
7.8%

Real Estate

RWM

-

SPY
1.8%

Technology

RWM

-

SPY
39.0%

Utilities

RWM

-

SPY
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Short Russell2000

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with RWM:
RWM vs. IWMRWM vs. QIDRWM vs. TWMRWM vs. PSQRWM vs. QQQRWM vs. SHRWM vs. EMTY
Often compared with SPY:
SPY vs. QQQSPY vs. VOOSPY vs. BRK-BSPY vs. RSPSPY vs. VTISPY vs. SCHDSPY vs. GLD

Return for Risk

RWM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RWMSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.47
2.16

-3.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-2.14
2.91

-5.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.39

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.03

3.01

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.83

13.54

-15.37

RWM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.47, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and SPY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RWMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.58%

-55.19%

-40.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.83%

-8.88%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.69%

-18.76%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-24.50%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.31%

-33.72%

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.58%

-1.75%

-93.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-9.04%

-65.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.55%

1.97%

+14.58%

Volatility

RWM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that RWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RWMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

4.64%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

9.75%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

12.43%

+7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

17.14%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

17.99%

+5.18%

RWM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000		4.28%3.97%6.03%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF		1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

RWM and SPY have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWM has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.58% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs -12.42% for RWM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs -12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RWM.

RWM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

RWM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RWM and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWM and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer