RWLC vs. IBIC
RWLC (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RWLC returned 21.97% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWLC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
RWLC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWLC achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.
RWLC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWLC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF | 12.91% | 20.23% | 28.58% | 5.74% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWLC and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.00 |
The correlation between RWLC and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWLC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
RWLC
IBIC
RWLC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWLC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 2.24 | -0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 17.27 | -14.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 67.45 | -58.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWLC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 5.05 | -3.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 3.49 | -2.64 |
Drawdowns
RWLC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWLC drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWLC and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWLC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -0.90% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -0.26% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.13% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -0.10% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 0.07% | +2.44% |
Volatility
RWLC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that RWLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWLC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 0.33% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 0.67% | +10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 0.90% | +12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 1.58% | +14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 1.58% | +14.90% |
RWLC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWLC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
RWLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF | 13.01% | 14.69% | 0.98% | 1.63% | 1.39% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWLC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWLC has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWLC dropped -21.00% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, RWLC leads with 21.97% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RWLC has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RWLC.
RWLC has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
RWLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RWLC tracks S&P 500, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RWLC and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWLC and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer