RWLC vs. RWEM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RWLC (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF) and RWEM (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while RWEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWLC returned 23.44%/yr vs 24.58%/yr for RWEM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWLC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RWEM.

Performance

RWLC vs. RWEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWLC achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than RWEM's 27.68% return.

RWLC

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RWEM

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 6.68%
• YTD: 27.68%
• 6M: 30.93%
• 1Y: 52.26%
• 3Y*: 24.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWLC vs. RWEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF	11.76%	20.23%	28.58%	14.40%	-12.40%	1.69%
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.68%	28.17%	7.24%	21.56%	-20.11%	0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RWLC and RWEM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between RWLC and RWEM has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RWLC vs. RWEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWLC	RWEM
Technology	27.9%	36.8%
Financial Services	15.7%	23.6%
Healthcare	11.8%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	6.3%
Communication Services	9.7%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	4.5%
Energy	6.6%	4.3%
Industrials	5.6%	6.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	7.9%
Utilities	1.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

RWLC vs. RWEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWLC

RWLC Risk / Return Rank: 49
RWLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RWLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RWLC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RWLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RWLC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

RWEM

RWEM Risk / Return Rank: 53
RWEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RWEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RWEM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RWEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RWEM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWLC vs. RWEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWLC	RWEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.51	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.07	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	3.41	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	10.75	-1.91

RWLC vs. RWEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the RWEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWLC and RWEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWLC vs. RWEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWLC drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum RWEM drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWLC and RWEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWLC	RWEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-26.92%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-15.39%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.20%	-22.56%	+6.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.40%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-9.57%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	4.87%	-2.31%

Volatility

RWLC vs. RWEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) is 4.64%, while Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) has a volatility of 15.58%. This indicates that RWLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWLC	RWEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	15.58%	-10.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	29.40%	-18.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.38%	34.92%	-20.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	22.29%	-5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	22.29%	-5.78%

RWLC vs. RWEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RWEM's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWLC vs. RWEM - Dividend Comparison

RWLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, more than RWEM's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.69%	2.15%	3.59%	1.60%	5.59%	0.39%
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF	13.14%	14.69%	0.98%	1.63%	1.39%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWLC and RWEM in my portfolio?

RWLC and RWEM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWLC or RWEM?

RWEM has higher volatility (15.58%) compared to RWLC (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWLC dropped -21.00% vs RWEM's -26.92%.

Which ETF is better, RWLC or RWEM?

On 3-year performance, RWEM leads with 24.58% vs 23.44% for RWLC. On fees, RWLC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, RWLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWLC or RWEM?

Over the 3-year period, RWEM has performed better with a 24.58% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWLC or RWEM?

RWLC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RWEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWLC or RWEM?

RWLC has the higher dividend yield at 13.14%, compared with 1.69% for RWEM.

What is the main difference between RWLC and RWEM?

RWLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RWEM is Emerging Markets Equities. RWLC tracks S&P 500, while RWEM tracks FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RWLC and 0.52% for RWEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.