RWLC vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RWLC (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RWLC is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWLC returned 23.44%/yr vs 13.55%/yr for BDGS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWLC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

RWLC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWLC achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.55% return.

RWLC

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: 12.84%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWLC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF	11.76%	20.23%	28.58%	11.09%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.55%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RWLC and BDGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.66

The correlation between RWLC and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWLC vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWLC	BDGS
Technology	27.9%	37.4%
Financial Services	15.7%	9.3%
Healthcare	11.8%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	10.9%
Communication Services	9.7%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	4.1%
Energy	6.6%	2.6%
Industrials	5.6%	6.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.5%
Utilities	1.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.5%

Return for Risk

RWLC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWLC

RWLC Risk / Return Rank: 49
RWLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RWLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RWLC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RWLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RWLC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 70
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWLC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWLC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.03	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.03	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	3.20	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	14.21	-5.37

RWLC vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWLC and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWLC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWLC drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWLC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWLC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-9.12%	-11.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-4.03%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.20%	-9.12%	-7.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.84%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-0.66%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	0.91%	+1.65%

Volatility

RWLC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.28%. This indicates that RWLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWLC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	2.28%	+2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	5.16%	+5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.38%	6.38%	+8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	8.23%	+8.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	8.23%	+8.28%

RWLC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWLC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

RWLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF	13.14%	14.69%	0.98%	1.63%	1.39%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWLC and BDGS in my portfolio?

RWLC and BDGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWLC or BDGS?

RWLC has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to BDGS (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWLC dropped -21.00% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, RWLC or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, RWLC leads with 23.44% vs 13.55% for BDGS. On fees, RWLC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWLC or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, RWLC has performed better with a 23.44% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWLC or BDGS?

RWLC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWLC or BDGS?

RWLC has the higher dividend yield at 13.14%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between RWLC and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RWLC and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.