RWL vs. SPYM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RWL (Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - RWL tracks the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index while SPYM tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWL returned 13.96%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.

Performance

RWL vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWL having a 11.07% return and SPYM slightly lower at 10.98%. Over the past 10 years, RWL has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 13.96%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.

RWL

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 11.66%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

SPYM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWL vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	11.07%	18.65%	16.45%	17.43%	-6.00%	30.29%	9.14%	27.83%	-7.74%	20.34%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	10.98%	17.79%	25.00%	26.24%	-18.09%	28.78%	18.49%	31.99%	-4.78%	21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RWL and SPYM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008	0.83

The correlation between RWL and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWL vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWL	SPYM
Healthcare	19.5%	8.4%
Financial Services	15.4%	11.1%
Technology	13.7%	38.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	4.6%
Industrials	8.6%	7.6%
Communication Services	7.5%	10.6%
Energy	6.6%	3.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.5%
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

RWL vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWL

RWL Risk / Return Rank: 81
RWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
RWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RWL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RWL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWL vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWL	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.39	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.27	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.44	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	3.17	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.12	14.76	+2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWL vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWL and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWL	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.39	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.83	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.87	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.62	-0.04

Drawdowns

RWL vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWL drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWL and SPYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWL	SPYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.83%	-54.46%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-8.90%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.39%	-18.72%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.49%	-24.48%	+6.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.04%	-33.87%	-2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.66%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-7.15%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.91%	-0.34%

Volatility

RWL vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is 2.12%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that RWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWL	SPYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.83%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	8.90%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	11.80%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	16.80%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	18.00%	-1.14%

RWL vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWL vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

RWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	1.25%	1.35%	1.43%	1.60%	1.62%	1.35%	1.75%	1.87%	1.99%	1.60%	1.71%	1.97%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWL and SPYM in my portfolio?

RWL and SPYM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWL or SPYM?

SPYM has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to RWL (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWL dropped -54.83% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

Which ETF is better, RWL or SPYM?

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 13.96% for RWL. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, RWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWL or SPYM?

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWL or SPYM?

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWL or SPYM?

RWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

What is the main difference between RWL and SPYM?

RWL tracks S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWL and 0.02% for SPYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.