RWL vs. BNO
RWL (Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RWL is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWL returned 13.96%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
RWL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWL achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWL having a 13.96% annualized return and BNO not far behind at 13.60%.
RWL
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
RWL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 11.07% | 18.65% | 16.45% | 17.43% | -6.00% | 30.29% | 9.14% | 27.83% | -7.74% | 20.34% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWL and BNO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010 | 0.29 |
The correlation between RWL and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
RWL
BNO
RWL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 5.17 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.12 | 9.76 | +7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.23 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.69 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.37 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.14 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
RWL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWL drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWL and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.83% | -87.06% | +32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -17.87% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -23.75% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -33.70% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.04% | -75.18% | +39.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -10.29% | +9.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -40.17% | +33.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 9.45% | -7.88% |
Volatility
RWL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is 2.12%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that RWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 14.22% | -12.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 36.10% | -28.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 41.46% | -31.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 35.38% | -20.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 36.68% | -19.82% |
RWL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
RWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.25% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWL and BNO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to RWL (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWL dropped -54.83% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 10-year performance, RWL leads with 13.96% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, RWL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWL has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
RWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
RWL is categorized as S&P 500, while BNO is Oil & Gas. RWL tracks S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWL and 0.90% for BNO.
RWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWL and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer