PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWK vs. VUSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWK vs. VUSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than VUSE's 10.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWK having a 12.83% annualized return and VUSE not far behind at 12.44%.


RWK

1D
1.10%
1M
3.22%
YTD
13.73%
6M
14.17%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
12.83%

VUSE

1D
-0.35%
1M
5.75%
YTD
10.02%
6M
10.35%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWK vs. VUSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
13.73%10.27%11.94%23.76%-8.19%34.31%11.06%28.20%-14.65%13.39%
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
10.02%13.18%15.77%24.36%-9.42%35.46%6.76%20.74%-15.25%16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and VUSE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between RWK and VUSE has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RWK vs. VUSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWK
VUSE

Industrials

21.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

20.7%
10.5%

Technology

14.0%
33.1%

Financial Services

13.1%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
7.3%

Energy

5.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.7%

Healthcare

4.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.0%

Utilities

1.6%
1.3%

Communication Services

0.7%
9.4%

Industrials

RWK
21.8%
VUSE
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RWK
20.7%
VUSE
10.5%

Technology

RWK
14.0%
VUSE
33.1%

Financial Services

RWK
13.1%
VUSE
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

RWK
11.3%
VUSE
7.3%

Energy

RWK
5.3%
VUSE
2.6%

Basic Materials

RWK
4.7%
VUSE
2.7%

Healthcare

RWK
4.0%
VUSE
9.5%

Real Estate

RWK
2.8%
VUSE
1.0%

Utilities

RWK
1.6%
VUSE
1.3%

Communication Services

RWK
0.7%
VUSE
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWK vs. VUSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWK
RWK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSE
VUSE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWK vs. VUSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWKVUSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.59

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.25

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.19

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

8.17

+0.27

RWK vs. VUSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VUSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and VUSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWKVUSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.59

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.64

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.54

-0.06

Drawdowns

RWK vs. VUSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than VUSE's maximum drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and VUSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWKVUSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-43.92%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-9.28%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.58%

-18.93%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-21.34%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

-43.92%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-5.63%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.48%

+0.98%

Volatility

RWK vs. VUSE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) at 2.91%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWKVUSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.91%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

9.50%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

12.62%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

17.46%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

20.21%

+2.75%

RWK vs. VUSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWK vs. VUSE - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than VUSE's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.12%1.25%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.99%1.30%0.92%
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
0.44%0.47%0.84%1.15%1.57%1.16%1.33%1.61%1.55%1.16%1.25%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWK and VUSE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWK has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to VUSE (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs VUSE's -43.92%.

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 12.83% vs 12.44% for VUSE. On fees, RWK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VUSE has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VUSE.

RWK has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.44% for VUSE.

RWK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VUSE is Mid Cap Value Equities. RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VUSE tracks Vident U.S. Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vident. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.50% for VUSE.

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWK and VUSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer