RWK vs. BCSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX).
RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. BCSIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 23, 1992.
Performance
RWK vs. BCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWK vs. BCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.75% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 23.76% | -8.19% | 34.31% | 11.06% | 28.20% | -14.65% | 13.39% |
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | -21.99% | -57.15% | 9.86% | 19.16% | -37.85% | -4.26% | 45.23% | 29.22% | -0.57% | 28.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than BCSIX's -21.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RWK has outperformed BCSIX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while BCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower -3.29% annualized return.
RWK
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
BCSIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -21.99%
- 6M
- -62.81%
- 1Y
- -60.19%
- 3Y*
- -26.21%
- 5Y*
- -22.62%
- 10Y*
- -3.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWK vs. BCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWK vs. BCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
RWK
BCSIX
RWK vs. BCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWK | BCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | -1.06 | +1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | -1.26 | +2.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.65 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | -0.95 | +2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -1.98 | +7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWK | BCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | -1.06 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | -0.50 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | -0.09 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.24 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWK and BCSIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWK vs. BCSIX - Dividend Comparison
RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while BCSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 52.70% | 9.36% | 12.04% | 9.32% | 7.46% | 8.62% | 6.85% | 5.94% | 5.54% | 9.15% |
Drawdowns
RWK vs. BCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum BCSIX drawdown of -79.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and BCSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWK | BCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.49% | -79.03% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -64.24% | +50.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -79.03% | +54.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | -79.03% | +32.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -78.90% | +71.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -13.57% | +5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 30.84% | -26.83% |
Volatility
RWK vs. BCSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is 5.93%, while Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that RWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWK | BCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 6.52% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 75.03% | -62.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 58.33% | -36.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 45.44% | -24.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 36.22% | -13.29% |