BCSIX vs. CALF
BCSIX (Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both funds - BCSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Over the past 5 years, BCSIX returned -7.69%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for CALF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
BCSIX vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSIX achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 10.59% return.
BCSIX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -6.44%
- 3Y*
- -2.50%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
CALF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BCSIX vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | -5.70% | -12.48% | 9.86% | 19.16% | -37.85% | -4.26% | 45.23% | 29.22% | -0.57% | 10.01% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.59% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSIX and CALF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between BCSIX and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSIX vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
BCSIX
CALF
BCSIX vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCSIX | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.29 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 4.22 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 11.59 | -12.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCSIX vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSIX drawdown since its inception was -57.17%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSIX and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSIX | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.17% | -47.58% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -6.15% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.17% | -34.22% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.17% | -34.22% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.92% | -4.33% | -43.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -10.69% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 2.23% | +9.50% |
Volatility
BCSIX vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 5.39%. This indicates that BCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSIX | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 5.39% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 10.92% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 16.05% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.12% | 23.39% | +15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 25.97% | +6.41% |
BCSIX vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSIX vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
BCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.09%, more than CALF's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | 115.09% | 108.53% | 52.70% | 9.36% | 12.04% | 9.32% | 7.46% | 8.62% | 6.85% | 5.94% | 5.54% | 9.15% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSIX and CALF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCSIX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to CALF (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSIX dropped -57.17% vs CALF's -47.58%.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCSIX and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer