RWJ vs. VDC
RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWJ is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWJ returned 13.64%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for VDC. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWJ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
RWJ vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 21.05% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RWJ has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 13.64%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.
RWJ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 21.05%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 42.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VDC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 8.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
RWJ vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 21.05% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -16.95% | 5.30% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.55% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and VDC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RWJ and VDC has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RWJ vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWJ
VDC
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RWJ
VDC
Industrials
RWJ
VDC
Healthcare
RWJ
VDC
Financial Services
RWJ
VDC
-
Technology
RWJ
VDC
-
Energy
RWJ
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
RWJ
VDC
Basic Materials
RWJ
VDC
Real Estate
RWJ
VDC
-
Communication Services
RWJ
VDC
-
Utilities
RWJ
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
VDC
RWJ vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 0.79 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 1.60 | +9.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -34.24% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -9.28% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -11.78% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -16.55% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -25.31% | -26.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.37% | +4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -3.73% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 4.57% | -1.05% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) have volatilities of 4.67% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 4.62% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 10.02% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 12.57% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 13.17% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 14.66% | +11.48% |
RWJ vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWJ vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than VDC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWJ and VDC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWJ has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, RWJ leads with 13.64% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWJ has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.97% for RWJ.
RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.09% for VDC.
RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWJ and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer