RWJ vs. BSMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC).
RWJ and BSMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. BSMC is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.
Performance
RWJ vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWJ vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 4.08% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 18.58% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 4.40% | 15.52% | 10.21% | 11.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than BSMC's 4.40% return.
RWJ
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
BSMC
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWJ vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
BSMC
RWJ vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWJ | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.24 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.86 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.92 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 7.85 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWJ | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.24 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.07 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and BSMC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWJ vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than BSMC's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 1.13% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.00% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than BSMC's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and BSMC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -19.15% | -36.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -12.60% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -6.19% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -2.70% | -6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 3.07% | +1.45% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) at 5.58%. This indicates that RWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 5.58% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 10.46% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 19.31% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 16.27% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 16.27% | +9.89% |