PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIN vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIN vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RWIN

1D
1.12%
1M
4.09%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BUFI

1D
0.55%
1M
1.28%
6M
4.87%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$629.89K$764.68K$589.32K
$5.81K$6.02K$8.35K

RWIN vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RWIN and BUFI is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIN vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWIN vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWINBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

RWIN vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWIN vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum BUFI drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWINBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-7.43%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-0.84%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

Volatility

RWIN vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWINBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

9.04%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

9.26%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

9.26%

+5.48%

RWIN vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIN vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RWIN and BUFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

RWIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

RWIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.69% for BUFI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIN and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer