PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIGX vs. FMIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than FMIEX's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX has outperformed FMIEX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while FMIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.


RWIGX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.72%
YTD
16.57%
6M
18.15%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
12.56%

FMIEX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.56%
YTD
13.17%
6M
15.54%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
16.57%25.09%14.21%20.87%-17.02%15.11%15.71%25.94%-10.32%24.95%
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
13.17%30.93%8.66%5.67%-0.12%25.11%2.04%17.27%-5.67%11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and FMIEX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between RWIGX and FMIEX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIGX
RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FMIEX
FMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWIGXFMIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

3.21

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

4.61

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.56

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

4.24

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.67

17.24

-2.57

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FMIEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and FMIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWIGXFMIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

3.21

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.89

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.60

+0.05

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and FMIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIGXFMIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-49.85%

+17.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-7.04%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-9.52%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-18.63%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-39.33%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-6.58%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.73%

+0.65%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison

Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 2.82%. This indicates that RWIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIGXFMIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

2.82%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

7.22%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

9.30%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

12.73%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.72%

+0.33%

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIGX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than FMIEX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
5.05%5.76%9.02%3.27%8.54%4.34%1.74%3.82%18.46%16.45%5.16%11.75%
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
9.36%10.86%8.23%3.44%2.45%7.16%1.53%2.90%7.37%6.94%5.60%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWIGX and FMIEX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWIGX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FMIEX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs FMIEX's -49.85%.

FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIGX and FMIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer