RW vs. POW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RW (Rainwater Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RW charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

RW vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RW achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.

RW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.46%
• 6M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 1Y: -2.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.19%

POW

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -10.55%
• 6M: 14.53%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.21M	$2.19M	$3.04M
RW Rainwater Equity ETF	$44.56K	$41.45K	$44.87K

RW vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RW Rainwater Equity ETF	1.78%	-3.31%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	31.51%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RW and POW is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

RW vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RW

RW Risk / Return Rank: 8
RW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RW vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RW	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	—	—

Drawdowns

RW vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RW drawdown since its inception was -17.04%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RW and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RW	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-28.02%	+10.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-22.73%	+18.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-5.52%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RW	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	34.38%	-18.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	34.38%	-18.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	34.38%	-18.90%

RW vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RW has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RW vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than POW's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.15%	0.19%
RW Rainwater Equity ETF	0.10%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RW and POW in my portfolio?

RW and POW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RW or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RW or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for RW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RW or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.10% for RW.

What is the main difference between RW and POW?

RW is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for RW and 0.75% for POW.