PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVRB vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RVRB vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reverb ETF (RVRB) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RVRB vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RVRB
Reverb ETF
-5.44%18.86%24.48%26.80%1.74%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
6.82%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVRB achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.82% return.


RVRB

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
10Y*

THLV

1D
1.01%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
6.82%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RVRB vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVRB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RVRB vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVRB
RVRB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RVRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVRB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RVRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVRB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVRB vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reverb ETF (RVRB) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVRBTHLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.79

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.50

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.15

-1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

11.39

-4.45

RVRB vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVRB and THLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVRBTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.79

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.86

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between RVRB and THLV is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RVRB vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

RVRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than THLV's 1.66% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
RVRB
Reverb ETF
1.80%1.93%1.68%0.97%0.27%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.66%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%

Drawdowns

RVRB vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVRB drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVRB and THLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RVRBTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-13.15%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-6.66%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-4.37%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-3.75%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.84%

+0.75%

Volatility

RVRB vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Reverb ETF (RVRB) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.55%. This indicates that RVRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RVRBTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.55%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

7.61%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

11.31%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

11.80%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

11.80%

+2.87%