PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVRB vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RVRB vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reverb ETF (RVRB) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RVRB vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RVRB
Reverb ETF
-5.44%18.86%24.48%26.80%1.74%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
-3.88%16.93%23.87%25.55%1.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVRB achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's -3.88% return.


RVRB

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
10Y*

SPTM

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.39%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
13.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RVRB vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVRB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RVRB vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVRB
RVRB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RVRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVRB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RVRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVRB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVRB vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reverb ETF (RVRB) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVRBSPTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

1.48

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

7.28

-0.34

RVRB vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVRB and SPTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVRBSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.43

+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between RVRB and SPTM is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RVRB vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

RVRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than SPTM's 1.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RVRB
Reverb ETF
1.80%1.93%1.68%0.97%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.20%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Drawdowns

RVRB vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVRB drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVRB and SPTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RVRBSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-54.80%

+35.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-12.21%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-6.07%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-9.10%

+6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.53%

+0.06%

Volatility

RVRB vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reverb ETF (RVRB) is 4.05%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that RVRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RVRBSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

5.32%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

9.52%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

18.32%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

16.88%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

18.03%

-3.36%