RVNU vs. TAXI
RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index while TAXI tracks the ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.
Performance
RVNU vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.97% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 10.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
TAXI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.76% | 5.37% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.97% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and TAXI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
TAXI
RVNU vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.95 | -2.56 |
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and TAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -2.23% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -0.77% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -0.46% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNU vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 1.90% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 1.90% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.28% | 1.90% | +5.38% |
RVNU vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RVNU vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.51% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNU and TAXI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.
RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while TAXI tracks ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.05% for TAXI.
Find the right allocation for RVNU and TAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer