RVNU vs. FTMA
RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index while FTMA tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FTMA.
Performance
RVNU vs. FTMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than FTMA's 2.28% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- 1Y
- 8.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
FTMA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU vs. FTMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 4.08% | -0.60% |
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 2.28% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and FTMA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. FTMA — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
FTMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RVNU vs. FTMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RVNU | FTMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. FTMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than FTMA's maximum drawdown of -2.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and FTMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | FTMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -2.27% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | 0.00% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.47% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNU vs. FTMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | FTMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 3.39% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 3.39% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 3.39% | +3.87% |
RVNU vs. FTMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVNU vs. FTMA - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FTMA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 1.95% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.50% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNU and FTMA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 1.95% for FTMA.
RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while FTMA tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.35% for FTMA.
Find the right allocation for RVNU and FTMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer