RVNL vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RVNL (GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RVNL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. RVNL is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, RVNL returned -16.81% vs 82.92% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RVNL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

RVNL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNL achieves a -45.20% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 80.79% return.

RVNL

• 1D: -19.35%
• 1M: 21.38%
• YTD: -45.20%
• 6M: -37.35%
• 1Y: -16.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 80.79%
• 6M: 73.97%
• 1Y: 82.92%
• 3Y*: 25.89%
• 5Y*: 22.87%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF	-45.20%	117.81%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	80.79%	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNL and BNO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

RVNL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNL

RVNL Risk / Return Rank: 11
RVNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RVNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
RVNL Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RVNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RVNL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 62
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVNL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	2.00	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	2.53	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.34	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	4.66	-4.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	8.73	-9.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVNL vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNL Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNL and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVNL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	2.00	-2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.13	+0.01

Drawdowns

RVNL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNL	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.92%	-87.06%	+14.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.92%	-17.87%	-55.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.98%	-14.85%	-43.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.22%	-40.16%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.30%	9.53%	+30.77%

Volatility

RVNL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) has a higher volatility of 37.10% compared to United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) at 11.71%. This indicates that RVNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVNL	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.10%	11.71%	+25.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.68%	36.33%	+57.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.61%	41.63%	+85.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.00%	35.41%	+89.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.00%	36.69%	+88.31%

RVNL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVNL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither RVNL nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNL and BNO in my portfolio?

RVNL and BNO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVNL or BNO?

RVNL has higher volatility (37.10%) compared to BNO (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNL dropped -72.92% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, RVNL or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 82.92% vs -16.81% for RVNL. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BNO has been the lower-risk option at 11.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVNL or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 82.92% return vs -16.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNL or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for RVNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNL or BNO?

RVNL and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RVNL and BNO?

RVNL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for RVNL and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.