PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOI vs. CRWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCOI vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOI achieves a -34.19% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 45.26% return.


CCOI

1D
-3.41%
1M
-22.03%
YTD
-34.19%
6M
-35.19%
1Y
-70.37%
3Y*
-36.53%
5Y*
-24.92%
10Y*
-5.06%

CRWD

1D
0.81%
1M
2.63%
YTD
45.26%
6M
42.20%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
67.98%
5Y*
21.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOI vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
-34.19%-70.14%7.19%41.23%-17.20%27.78%-5.33%11.48%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
45.26%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-21.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOI and CRWD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCOI:

$676.49M

CRWD:

$175.60B

EPS

CCOI:

-$3.56

CRWD:

-$0.02

PS Ratio

CCOI:

0.71

CRWD:

33.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCOI:

$948.70M

CRWD:

$5.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCOI:

$307.44M

CRWD:

$3.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCOI:

$187.51M

CRWD:

$246.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOI vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOI
CCOI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CCOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOI vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCOICRWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.18

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.04

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

2.35

-3.78

CCOI vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOI Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOI and CRWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCOI vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOI drawdown since its inception was -96.72%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOI and CRWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOICRWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.72%

-67.69%

-29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.40%

-37.18%

-35.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.04%

-44.44%

-37.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.04%

-67.69%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.04%

-12.94%

-69.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.43%

-23.58%

-36.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.20%

16.41%

+32.79%

Volatility

CCOI vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) has a higher volatility of 26.98% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) at 17.48%. This indicates that CCOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOICRWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.98%

17.48%

+9.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.38%

37.24%

+32.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.06%

45.43%

+41.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.17%

50.65%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.13%

55.99%

-14.86%

Dividends

CCOI vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

CCOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
7.59%14.15%5.09%4.94%6.23%4.33%4.64%3.71%4.69%3.97%3.65%4.21%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCOI vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
239.19M
1.39B
(CCOI) Total Revenue
(CRWD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCOI vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
46.0%
75.3%
Portfolio components
CCOI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.96M and revenue of 239.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.0%.

CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.

CCOI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.51M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

CCOI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -39.54M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCOI and CRWD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCOI has higher volatility (26.98%) compared to CRWD (17.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOI dropped -96.72% vs CRWD's -67.69%.

CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOI and CRWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer