PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUD.TO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than IDIV-B.TO's 10.75% return.


RUD.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
5.71%
YTD
8.99%
6M
6.16%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
13.02%

IDIV-B.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
8.02%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)
8.99%7.31%22.78%19.01%-1.58%
IDIV-B.TO
Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units
10.75%35.22%12.85%12.28%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.35

Over the past year, RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUD.TO
RUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IDIV-B.TO
IDIV-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IDIV-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RUD.TOIDIV-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.60

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

11.03

+0.87

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IDIV-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RUD.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.59

-0.78

Drawdowns

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than IDIV-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RUD.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-13.62%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-10.03%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.33%

-13.62%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.00%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-1.72%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.36%

-0.50%

Volatility

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) is 2.59%, while Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that RUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDIV-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RUD.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

5.14%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

13.24%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

15.48%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

14.06%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

14.06%

+1.47%

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RUD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IDIV-B.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RUD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than IDIV-B.TO's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDIV-B.TO
Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units
2.80%3.02%3.49%1.73%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)
1.37%1.35%1.16%1.49%1.57%1.10%1.64%1.93%2.01%1.78%1.73%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RUD.TO is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RUD.TO is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO.

RUD.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDIV-B.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: RBC and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for RUD.TO and 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RUD.TO and IDIV-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer