IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
IDIV-B.TO (Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. IDIV-B.TO is actively managed, while ZDIV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDIV-B.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IDIV-B.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IDIV-B.TO Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units | 2.16% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDIV-B.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IDIV-B.TO
ZDIV.TO
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDIV-B.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDIV-B.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 5.66 | -4.07 |
Drawdowns
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDIV-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDIV-B.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDIV-B.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -2.60% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -1.02% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -0.49% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDIV-B.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 9.99% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 9.99% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 9.99% | +4.07% |
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDIV-B.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDIV-B.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
IDIV-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDIV-B.TO Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units | 2.80% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 0.20% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDIV-B.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Manulife and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for IDIV-B.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer