RTXG vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RTXG is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

RTXG vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a -16.61% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 129.31% return.

RTXG

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: -16.61%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: 129.31%
• 6M: 97.01%
• 1Y: 156.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTXG vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	-16.61%	60.90%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	129.31%	14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RTXG and NRGU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

RTXG vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 58
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTXG vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTXG	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.45	+0.27

Drawdowns

RTXG vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTXG	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.49%	-57.50%	+20.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.25%	-20.91%	-15.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-25.42%	+16.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RTXG	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	31.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	61.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.66%	75.15%	-26.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.66%	89.15%	-40.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.66%	89.15%	-40.49%

RTXG vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTXG vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	7.63%	6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTXG and NRGU in my portfolio?

RTXG and NRGU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RTXG or NRGU?

On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTXG or NRGU?

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTXG or NRGU?

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between RTXG and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 0.95% for NRGU.