PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTXAX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTXAX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than FAMRX's 14.17% return.


RTXAX

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
15.17%
6M
14.91%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

FAMRX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.43%
YTD
14.17%
6M
13.73%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
15.17%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
14.17%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%11.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RTXAX and FAMRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between RTXAX and FAMRX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTXAX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXAXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

3.31

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.57

14.35

+4.21

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTXAX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXAX drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXAX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXAXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.68%

-58.65%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.21%

-9.33%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-15.35%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

-26.00%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.06%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-12.30%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.15%

-0.75%

Volatility

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) is 3.40%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that RTXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXAXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

5.36%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

10.97%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

13.13%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

14.78%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

15.33%

+4.69%

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTXAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTXAX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than FAMRX's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.87%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.49%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTXAX and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to RTXAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXAX dropped -40.68% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTXAX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer