PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTRE vs. DBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTRE vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTRE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.


RTRE

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.02%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBND

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTRE vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RTRE
Rareview Total Return Bond ETF
0.02%6.61%1.75%
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.21%7.41%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RTRE and DBND is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.89

The correlation between RTRE and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTRE vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTRE
RTRE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTRE vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTREDBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.72

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

5.10

-0.75

RTRE vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTRE and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTREDBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.48

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.48

+0.40

Drawdowns

RTRE vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTRE drawdown since its inception was -4.99%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTRE and DBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTREDBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-9.39%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-2.83%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-1.80%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-2.27%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.95%

+0.24%

Volatility

RTRE vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that RTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTREDBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.07%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

2.33%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

3.30%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.79%

5.09%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

5.09%

-0.30%

RTRE vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTRE vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

RTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.79%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%
RTRE
Rareview Total Return Bond ETF
4.37%4.02%3.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RTRE and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RTRE has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTRE dropped -4.99% vs DBND's -9.39%.

On 1-year performance, RTRE leads with 5.19% vs 4.85% for DBND. On fees, DBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RTRE has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RTRE.

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.37% for RTRE.

They also come from different issuers: Rareview and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RTRE and 0.50% for DBND.

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTRE and DBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer