RTRE vs. BEGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RTRE (Rareview Total Return Bond ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTRE is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Rareview, while BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RTRE returned 5.19% vs -17.10% for BEGS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.

Performance

RTRE vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTRE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than BEGS's -29.99% return.

RTRE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: -0.17%
• 1Y: 5.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEGS

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: -21.16%
• YTD: -29.99%
• 6M: -29.65%
• 1Y: -17.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTRE vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RTRE Rareview Total Return Bond ETF	0.02%	5.98%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-29.99%	39.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RTRE and BEGS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025	0.14

The correlation between RTRE and BEGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RTRE vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTRE

RTRE Risk / Return Rank: 32
RTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
RTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 7
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTRE vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTRE	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	-0.27	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	0.04	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.01	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	-0.36	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.36	-0.73	+5.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTRE vs. BEGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the BEGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTRE and BEGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTRE	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	-0.27	+1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	-0.03	+0.91

Drawdowns

RTRE vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTRE drawdown since its inception was -4.99%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -48.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTRE and BEGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTRE	BEGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-48.12%	+43.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.70%	-48.12%	+44.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-48.12%	+45.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-16.56%	+15.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	23.52%	-22.33%

Volatility

RTRE vs. BEGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) is 1.66%, while Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that RTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTRE	BEGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	13.37%	-11.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.29%	53.99%	-50.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.29%	63.80%	-59.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.79%	62.45%	-57.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.79%	62.45%	-57.66%

RTRE vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTRE vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

RTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than BEGS's 68.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	68.89%	48.23%	0.00%
RTRE Rareview Total Return Bond ETF	4.37%	4.02%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTRE and BEGS in my portfolio?

RTRE and BEGS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTRE or BEGS?

BEGS has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to RTRE (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTRE dropped -4.99% vs BEGS's -48.12%.

Which ETF is better, RTRE or BEGS?

On 1-year performance, RTRE leads with 5.19% vs -17.10% for BEGS. On fees, RTRE is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RTRE has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RTRE or BEGS?

Over the 1-year period, RTRE has performed better with a 5.19% return vs -17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTRE or BEGS?

RTRE is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTRE or BEGS?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 68.89%, compared with 4.37% for RTRE.

What is the main difference between RTRE and BEGS?

RTRE is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BEGS is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RTRE and 0.99% for BEGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.