RTNAX vs. FAOCX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

RTNAX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund) and FAOCX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RTNAX returned 7.56%/yr vs 6.69%/yr for FAOCX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RTNAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for FAOCX.

Performance

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, RTNAX has outperformed FAOCX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while FAOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.69% annualized return.

RTNAX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 5.22%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

FAOCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: -3.48%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 2.43%
• 10Y*: 6.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund	9.25%	30.15%	2.73%	13.43%	-16.20%	7.56%	6.57%	19.17%	-16.58%	27.94%
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C	0.00%	14.19%	3.86%	19.03%	-25.22%	17.97%	13.77%	26.37%	-15.77%	28.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RTNAX and FAOCX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between RTNAX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RTNAX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTNAX

RTNAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
RTNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RTNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RTNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RTNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RTNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FAOCX

FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTNAX	FAOCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	-0.40	+1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	-0.49	+2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.92	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	-0.44	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.45	-0.69	+7.13

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the FAOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTNAX and FAOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTNAX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, smaller than the maximum FAOCX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTNAX and FAOCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTNAX	FAOCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.58%	-60.45%	+20.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.18%	-7.33%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	-14.05%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.86%	-36.96%	+6.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.58%	-36.96%	-2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-5.90%	+3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-15.59%	+6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	4.40%	-1.10%

Volatility

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that RTNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTNAX	FAOCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	0.00%	+4.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.26%	1.53%	+11.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.16%	8.16%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	16.69%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	16.28%	-0.65%

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTNAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTNAX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison

RTNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C	8.26%	8.26%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	2.22%	0.00%	0.51%	3.72%	3.07%	0.12%
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund	1.72%	1.88%	1.77%	1.60%	1.17%	2.08%	1.35%	2.09%	1.22%	1.14%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTNAX and FAOCX in my portfolio?

RTNAX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTNAX or FAOCX?

RTNAX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTNAX dropped -39.58% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.