PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTNAX vs. RETSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTNAX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than RETSX's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RTNAX has underperformed RETSX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while RETSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


RTNAX

1D
0.69%
1M
5.22%
YTD
12.24%
6M
14.71%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
7.95%

RETSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.72%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.96%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTNAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
12.24%30.15%2.73%13.43%-16.20%7.56%6.57%19.17%-16.58%27.94%
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
9.76%14.45%20.43%24.74%-18.96%24.82%17.70%28.94%-6.97%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RTNAX and RETSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.76

The correlation between RTNAX and RETSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTNAX vs. RETSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTNAX
RTNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RTNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RTNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

RETSX
RETSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RETSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RETSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTNAXRETSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.72

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

11.86

-3.35

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the RETSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTNAX and RETSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTNAXRETSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.16

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.75

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Drawdowns

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTNAX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, smaller than the maximum RETSX drawdown of -57.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTNAX and RETSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTNAXRETSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.58%

-57.35%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-9.29%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-18.79%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-25.62%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.58%

-33.52%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-10.54%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.12%

+1.08%

Volatility

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) at 2.82%. This indicates that RTNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RETSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTNAXRETSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

2.82%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

8.75%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

11.71%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

16.70%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

17.82%

-2.00%

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTNAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RETSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTNAX vs. RETSX - Dividend Comparison

RTNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than RETSX's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
0.40%0.44%0.49%0.54%0.59%0.14%0.47%0.78%0.90%1.02%0.84%0.76%
RTNAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
1.67%1.88%1.77%1.60%1.17%2.08%1.35%2.09%1.22%1.14%2.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTNAX and RETSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTNAX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to RETSX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTNAX dropped -39.58% vs RETSX's -57.35%.

RETSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTNAX and RETSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer