RTNAX vs. RETSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX).
RTNAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 1, 2015. RETSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 7, 1996.
Performance
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund | -2.71% | 30.15% | 2.73% | 13.43% | -16.20% | 7.56% | 6.57% | 19.17% | -16.58% | 27.94% |
RETSX Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund | -7.47% | 14.45% | 20.43% | 24.74% | -18.96% | 24.82% | 17.70% | 28.94% | -6.97% | 21.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTNAX achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly higher than RETSX's -7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RTNAX has underperformed RETSX with an annualized return of 6.71%, while RETSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.
RTNAX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
RETSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTNAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RETSX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTNAX vs. RETSX — Risk / Return Rank
RTNAX
RETSX
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTNAX | RETSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.65 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.05 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 0.77 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 3.50 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTNAX | RETSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.65 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.66 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTNAX and RETSX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Dividend Comparison
RTNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than RETSX's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund | 1.93% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.17% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 2.09% | 1.22% | 1.14% | 2.14% | 0.00% |
RETSX Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.90% | 1.02% | 0.84% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTNAX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, smaller than the maximum RETSX drawdown of -57.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTNAX and RETSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTNAX | RETSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.58% | -57.35% | +17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -12.20% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -25.62% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -33.52% | -6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.18% | -9.29% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -10.60% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.68% | +0.42% |
Volatility
RTNAX vs. RETSX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) at 4.12%. This indicates that RTNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RETSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTNAX | RETSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 4.12% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 8.92% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 18.01% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 16.67% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 17.79% | -2.06% |