RTHAX vs. FQTHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RTHAX (Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund) and FQTHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, RTHAX returned 0.60%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for FQTHX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTHAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTHX.

Performance

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than FQTHX's 3.21% return.

RTHAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 6.64%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: 0.60%
• 10Y*: 2.79%

FQTHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 9.29%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RTHAX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund	2.98%	2.11%	4.49%	7.78%	-13.62%	5.54%	3.84%	3.88%
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H	3.21%	5.94%	8.76%	8.88%	-14.00%	6.04%	4.90%	1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and FQTHX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019	0.79

The correlation between RTHAX and FQTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. FQTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTHAX

RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FQTHX

FQTHX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FQTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FQTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FQTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FQTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FQTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTHAX	FQTHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.53	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	4.15	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.62	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.87	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	9.99	-1.73

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FQTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and FQTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FQTHX drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and FQTHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTHAX	FQTHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-18.96%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.74%	-3.30%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	-7.78%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.89%	-18.96%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-4.68%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.95%	-0.12%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) is 0.75%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that RTHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTHAX	FQTHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	1.03%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	2.76%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88%	3.76%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.12%	5.37%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	6.06%	-1.08%

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTHX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTHAX vs. FQTHX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than FQTHX's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H	5.06%	6.76%	5.86%	3.67%	3.82%	3.03%	3.05%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTHAX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund	4.20%	3.60%	4.02%	3.97%	3.64%	2.80%	3.10%	3.83%	3.86%	3.44%	4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTHAX and FQTHX in my portfolio?

RTHAX and FQTHX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTHAX or FQTHX?

FQTHX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to RTHAX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs FQTHX's -18.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.