FQTHX vs. CXHYX
FQTHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H) and CXHYX (Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, FQTHX returned 2.56%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for CXHYX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQTHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CXHYX.
Performance
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQTHX achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than CXHYX's 2.29% return.
FQTHX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
CXHYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H | 3.32% | 5.94% | 8.76% | 8.88% | -14.00% | 6.04% | 4.90% | 1.65% |
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 2.29% | 1.71% | 5.76% | 8.26% | -14.85% | 7.86% | 6.49% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQTHX and CXHYX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FQTHX and CXHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQTHX vs. CXHYX — Risk / Return Rank
FQTHX
CXHYX
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FQTHX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.30 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.73 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 4.96 | +5.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQTHX drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum CXHYX drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTHX and CXHYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQTHX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -21.82% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.30% | -3.31% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | -9.55% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | -20.11% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -2.58% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.15% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) is 1.01%, while Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that FQTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQTHX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.09% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.83% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 4.03% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 6.08% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 5.80% | +0.26% |
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CXHYX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQTHX vs. CXHYX - Dividend Comparison
FQTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than CXHYX's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.97% | 6.41% | 5.43% | 3.99% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 4.42% | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.98% | 3.87% | 3.77% |
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H | 5.05% | 6.76% | 5.86% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.03% | 3.05% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQTHX and CXHYX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXHYX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to FQTHX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTHX dropped -18.96% vs CXHYX's -21.82%.
FQTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQTHX and CXHYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer