RTHAX vs. REBYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX).
RTHAX is managed by Russell. It was launched on May 31, 2015. REBYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000.
Performance
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTHAX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund | -0.36% | 2.11% | 4.49% | 7.78% | -13.62% | 5.54% | 3.84% | 10.18% | 3.20% | 8.19% |
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | -0.86% | 8.86% | 8.16% | 13.81% | -16.14% | 26.28% | 13.04% | 23.74% | -12.22% | 2.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than REBYX's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RTHAX has underperformed REBYX with an annualized return of 2.84%, while REBYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.00% annualized return.
RTHAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
REBYX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than REBYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTHAX vs. REBYX — Risk / Return Rank
RTHAX
REBYX
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTHAX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 1.30 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.14 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 4.62 | -3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTHAX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.17 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.34 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.31 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTHAX and REBYX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Dividend Comparison
RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than REBYX's 8.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTHAX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund | 4.27% | 3.60% | 4.02% | 3.97% | 3.64% | 2.80% | 3.10% | 3.83% | 3.86% | 3.44% | 4.06% | 0.00% |
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | 8.35% | 8.28% | 13.03% | 2.64% | 5.30% | 31.12% | 0.64% | 4.46% | 18.61% | 0.33% | 0.88% | 8.23% |
Drawdowns
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum REBYX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and REBYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTHAX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -62.03% | +43.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -13.85% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | -32.68% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.89% | -44.79% | +25.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -9.16% | +6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -11.24% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.42% | -0.93% |
Volatility
RTHAX vs. REBYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) is 1.14%, while Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that RTHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTHAX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 6.02% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 12.78% | -11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 22.16% | -15.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 22.76% | -17.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 23.48% | -18.52% |