PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTHAX vs. REBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than REBYX's 17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RTHAX has underperformed REBYX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while REBYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


RTHAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.67%
6M
2.77%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.93%

REBYX

1D
1.35%
1M
1.21%
YTD
17.70%
6M
17.42%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.67%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
17.70%8.86%8.16%13.81%-16.14%26.28%13.04%23.74%-12.22%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and REBYX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.07

The correlation between RTHAX and REBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. REBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

REBYX
REBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
REBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
REBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
REBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
REBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTHAXREBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.36

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.06

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

14.02

-5.48

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the REBYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and REBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTHAXREBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.08

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.28

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.40

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.34

+0.34

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum REBYX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and REBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHAXREBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-62.03%

+43.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-9.16%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-32.68%

+25.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.89%

-32.68%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

-44.79%

+25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-11.17%

+7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.65%

-1.82%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) is 1.09%, while Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that RTHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHAXREBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

4.76%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

12.49%

-10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

17.84%

-14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

22.78%

-17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

23.52%

-18.54%

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than REBYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTHAX vs. REBYX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than REBYX's 7.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
7.03%8.28%13.03%2.64%5.30%31.12%0.64%4.46%18.61%0.33%0.88%8.23%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.21%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTHAX and REBYX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REBYX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to RTHAX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs REBYX's -62.03%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTHAX and REBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer