PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQTHX vs. STMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) and Sierra Tactical Municipal Fund (STMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTHX achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than STMYX's 2.16% return.


FQTHX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.40%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.93%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*

STMYX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.78%
YTD
2.16%
6M
2.32%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQTHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H
3.32%5.94%8.76%8.88%-14.00%6.04%4.90%1.65%
STMYX
Sierra Tactical Municipal Fund
2.16%-1.09%2.00%4.29%-2.93%3.35%4.35%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTHX and STMYX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.68

The correlation between FQTHX and STMYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQTHX vs. STMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTHX
FQTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FQTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

STMYX
STMYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
STMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
STMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) and Sierra Tactical Municipal Fund (STMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQTHXSTMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.54

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.32

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

7.46

+2.65

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the STMYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTHX and STMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTHX drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than STMYX's maximum drawdown of -9.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTHX and STMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQTHXSTMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-9.71%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-2.55%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-7.74%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-8.59%

-10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-3.14%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.79%

+0.16%

Volatility

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Sierra Tactical Municipal Fund (STMYX) at 0.67%. This indicates that FQTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQTHXSTMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.67%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

1.93%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

2.60%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

3.88%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.70%

+2.36%

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than STMYX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQTHX vs. STMYX - Dividend Comparison

FQTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than STMYX's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FQTHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H
5.05%6.76%5.86%3.67%3.82%3.03%3.05%1.43%
STMYX
Sierra Tactical Municipal Fund
3.59%3.44%3.03%2.46%1.13%4.78%2.47%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQTHX and STMYX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQTHX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to STMYX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTHX dropped -18.96% vs STMYX's -9.71%.

FQTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQTHX and STMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer