PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTH vs. UGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTH vs. UGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than UGE's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed UGE with an annualized return of 13.87%, while UGE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


RTH

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.10%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
13.87%

UGE

1D
-0.44%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
8.84%
6M
6.99%
1Y
-4.30%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTH vs. UGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
1.87%12.36%20.02%20.07%-17.67%24.94%31.62%29.06%3.87%22.45%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
8.84%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%42.44%56.64%58.28%-30.14%32.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RTH and UGE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.62

The correlation between RTH and UGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RTH vs. UGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RTH
UGE

Consumer Cyclical

56.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

27.6%
99.0%

Healthcare

13.5%

-

Industrials

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RTH
56.4%
UGE
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

RTH
27.6%
UGE
99.0%

Healthcare

RTH
13.5%
UGE

-

Industrials

RTH
2.5%
UGE

-

Basic Materials

RTH

-

UGE

-

Communication Services

RTH

-

UGE

-

Energy

RTH

-

UGE

-

Financial Services

RTH

-

UGE

-

Real Estate

RTH

-

UGE

-

Technology

RTH

-

UGE

-

Utilities

RTH

-

UGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTH vs. UGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTH
RTH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTH vs. UGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTHUGEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

-0.17

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

-0.07

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.99

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.23

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.46

-0.42

+3.88

RTH vs. UGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the UGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTH and UGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTHUGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

-0.17

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

-0.08

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.24

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.33

+0.16

Drawdowns

RTH vs. UGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum UGE drawdown of -71.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and UGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHUGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-71.36%

+29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-18.95%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-24.80%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.00%

-56.55%

+31.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.00%

-57.14%

+32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-38.51%

+32.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-18.73%

+11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

10.42%

-8.16%

Volatility

RTH vs. UGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 3.83%, while ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHUGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

7.65%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

19.46%

-10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

24.96%

-12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

31.31%

-14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

33.09%

-15.55%

RTH vs. UGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTH vs. UGE - Dividend Comparison

RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than UGE's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
0.95%0.97%0.77%1.07%1.16%0.78%0.64%0.91%1.05%1.56%1.84%2.25%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.24%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTH and UGE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGE has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to RTH (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs UGE's -71.36%.

On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 13.87% vs 7.75% for UGE. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.95% for RTH.

RTH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while UGE is Leveraged Equities. RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.95% for UGE.

RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTH and UGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer