RTH vs. UGE
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) are both exchange-traded funds - RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 13.87%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for UGE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UGE.
Performance
RTH vs. UGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than UGE's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed UGE with an annualized return of 13.87%, while UGE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
UGE
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- -4.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- -2.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
RTH vs. UGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 8.84% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and UGE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between RTH and UGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RTH vs. UGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTH
UGE
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RTH
UGE
Consumer Defensive
RTH
UGE
Healthcare
RTH
UGE
-
Industrials
RTH
UGE
-
Basic Materials
RTH
-
UGE
-
Communication Services
RTH
-
UGE
-
Energy
RTH
-
UGE
-
Financial Services
RTH
-
UGE
-
Real Estate
RTH
-
UGE
-
Technology
RTH
-
UGE
-
Utilities
RTH
-
UGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. UGE — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
UGE
RTH vs. UGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | UGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | -0.17 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | -0.07 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.99 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.23 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | -0.42 | +3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | UGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.17 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | -0.08 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.24 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.33 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. UGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum UGE drawdown of -71.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and UGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | UGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -71.36% | +29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -18.95% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -24.80% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -56.55% | +31.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -57.14% | +32.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -38.51% | +32.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -18.73% | +11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 10.42% | -8.16% |
Volatility
RTH vs. UGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 3.83%, while ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | UGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 7.65% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 19.46% | -10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 24.96% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 31.31% | -14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 33.09% | -15.55% |
RTH vs. UGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. UGE - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than UGE's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.24% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and UGE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGE has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to RTH (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs UGE's -71.36%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 13.87% vs 7.75% for UGE. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.95% for RTH.
RTH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while UGE is Leveraged Equities. RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.95% for UGE.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and UGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer