RTH vs. GXPD
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
RTH vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -0.87% return.
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTH vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 4.26% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.87% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and GXPD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
GXPD
RTH vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.26 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -16.61% | -25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -5.48% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -4.27% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
RTH vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 20.01% | -7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 20.01% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 20.01% | -2.47% |
RTH vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and GXPD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.
RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for RTH and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer