PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTH vs. GXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTH vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -0.87% return.


RTH

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.10%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
13.87%

GXPD

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTH vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RTH and GXPD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTH vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTH
RTH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTH vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTHGXPDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.46

RTH vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTHGXPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.26

+0.23

Drawdowns

RTH vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and GXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHGXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-16.61%

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-5.48%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-4.27%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

RTH vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHGXPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

20.01%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

20.01%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

20.01%

-2.47%

RTH vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTH vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
0.95%0.97%0.77%1.07%1.16%0.78%0.64%0.91%1.05%1.56%1.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTH and GXPD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.15% for GXPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTH and GXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer