RTH vs. CVR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR).
RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
RTH vs. CVR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTH vs. CVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.56% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | -28.32% | -11.27% | -4.80% | -39.01% | 12.53% | 18.81% | -9.31% | -14.62% | 2.63% | -21.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than CVR's -28.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed CVR with an annualized return of 13.65%, while CVR has yielded a comparatively lower -6.04% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
CVR
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -26.14%
- YTD
- -28.32%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- 1Y
- -7.69%
- 3Y*
- -29.32%
- 5Y*
- -15.47%
- 10Y*
- -6.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. CVR — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
CVR
RTH vs. CVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | CVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | -0.12 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 0.30 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.69 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | -1.36 | +7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | CVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -0.12 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | -0.35 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | -0.15 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.10 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and CVR is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RTH vs. CVR - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CVR's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | 1.21% | 0.86% | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 2.27% | 4.57% | 3.62% | 3.62% | 1.95% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. CVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum CVR drawdown of -77.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and CVR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | CVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -77.33% | +35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -37.54% | +28.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -70.66% | +45.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -77.33% | +52.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.86% | -73.63% | +67.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -33.60% | +26.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 19.03% | -16.71% |
Volatility
RTH vs. CVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 4.49%, while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | CVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 21.99% | -17.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | 42.23% | -33.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 68.62% | -53.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 44.29% | -27.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 40.78% | -23.25% |