CVR vs. SLG
CVR (Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.) and SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.) are both stocks. CVR operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while SLG operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, CVR returned -6.46%/yr vs -2.18%/yr for SLG. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CVR vs. SLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVR achieves a -21.26% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CVR has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -6.46%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -2.18% annualized return.
CVR
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- -21.26%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -4.44%
- 3Y*
- -24.08%
- 5Y*
- -14.14%
- 10Y*
- -6.46%
SLG
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 14.56%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- -19.37%
- 3Y*
- 35.73%
- 5Y*
- -3.69%
- 10Y*
- -2.18%
CVR vs. SLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | -21.26% | -11.27% | -4.80% | -39.01% | 12.53% | 18.81% | -9.31% | -14.62% | 2.63% | -21.14% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 9.96% | -29.03% | 58.26% | 48.75% | -50.94% | 22.86% | -29.14% | 20.96% | -18.80% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVR and SLG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CVR and SLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CVR:
$10.56M
SLG:
$3.83B
CVR:
-$1.91
SLG:
-$2.05
CVR:
0.38
SLG:
3.82
CVR:
0.57
SLG:
1.16
CVR:
$27.50M
SLG:
$993.51M
CVR:
$3.43M
SLG:
$662.81M
CVR:
-$1.08M
SLG:
$547.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVR vs. SLG — Risk / Return Rank
CVR
SLG
CVR vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVR | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.94 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.43 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | -0.72 | +0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVR vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVR drawdown since its inception was -77.33%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVR and SLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVR | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.33% | -94.02% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.06% | -45.40% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.58% | -53.91% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.66% | -74.27% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.33% | -77.70% | +0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.03% | -37.04% | -33.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -27.45% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 26.89% | -6.44% |
Volatility
CVR vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a higher volatility of 16.04% compared to SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) at 10.65%. This indicates that CVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVR | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.04% | 10.65% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.03% | 28.26% | +12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.47% | 38.00% | +20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.41% | 43.65% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 42.34% | -0.75% |
Dividends
CVR vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison
CVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SLG's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | 0.82% | 0.86% | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 2.27% | 4.57% | 3.62% | 3.62% | 1.95% | 5.26% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.36% | 6.18% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 5.09% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% |
Financials
CVR vs. SLG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CVR vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison
CVR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported a gross profit of 958.46K and revenue of 6.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
SLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 211.17M and revenue of 253.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
CVR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported an operating income of -381.59K and revenue of 6.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.
SLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 188.38M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.
CVR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported a net income of -362.02K and revenue of 6.85M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
SLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -84.39M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in a net margin of -33.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CVR and SLG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVR has higher volatility (16.04%) compared to SLG (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVR dropped -77.33% vs SLG's -94.02%.
CVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVR and SLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer