PortfoliosLab logo
CVR vs. SLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CVR and SLG is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CVR vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CVR:

-0.41

SLG:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

CVR:

-0.32

SLG:

1.02

Omega Ratio

CVR:

0.96

SLG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CVR:

-0.33

SLG:

0.52

Martin Ratio

CVR:

-0.99

SLG:

1.25

Ulcer Index

CVR:

25.39%

SLG:

17.25%

Daily Std Dev

CVR:

56.83%

SLG:

36.48%

Max Drawdown

CVR:

-77.33%

SLG:

-94.02%

Current Drawdown

CVR:

-67.65%

SLG:

-27.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVR:

$11.26M

SLG:

$4.33B

EPS

CVR:

-$4.67

SLG:

-$0.43

PEG Ratio

CVR:

0.00

SLG:

0.95

PS Ratio

CVR:

0.43

SLG:

6.67

PB Ratio

CVR:

0.54

SLG:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVR:

$26.38M

SLG:

$938.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVR:

$1.97M

SLG:

$521.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

CVR:

-$3.67M

SLG:

$426.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVR achieves a -21.99% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's -12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CVR has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -5.75%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -2.09% annualized return.


CVR

YTD

-21.99%

1M

-0.48%

6M

-29.35%

1Y

-23.13%

3Y*

-20.64%

5Y*

-6.48%

10Y*

-5.75%

SLG

YTD

-12.95%

1M

10.22%

6M

-24.49%

1Y

24.40%

3Y*

5.58%

5Y*

14.17%

10Y*

-2.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.

SL Green Realty Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVR vs. SLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CVR is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CVR is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CVR is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CVR is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CVR is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CVR is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CVR vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVR and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CVR vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

CVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than SLG's 5.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
2.11%2.08%3.77%3.07%3.35%2.27%4.57%3.62%3.62%2.38%4.18%3.64%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.67%4.43%7.15%10.95%8.49%7.82%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.77%

Drawdowns

CVR vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVR drawdown since its inception was -77.33%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVR and SLG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CVR vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a higher volatility of 22.09% compared to SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) at 9.00%. This indicates that CVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CVR vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
7.25M
239.85M
(CVR) Total Revenue
(SLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CVR vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. and SL Green Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
22.9%
49.5%
(CVR) Gross Margin
(SLG) Gross Margin
CVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported a gross profit of 1.66M and revenue of 7.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.

SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

CVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported an operating income of 70.17K and revenue of 7.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

CVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. reported a net income of 401.02K and revenue of 7.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.