PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSX vs. RSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSX vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 10.49% return.


RSSX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
1.26%
6M
0.73%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBT

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.49%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSX vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSSX and RSBT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.58

The correlation between RSSX and RSBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSX vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSX
RSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSX vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSSXRSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

4.58

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

12.25

-9.23

RSSX vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSX and RSBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSSXRSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.07

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.09

+0.89

Drawdowns

RSSX vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, which is greater than RSBT's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSX and RSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSXRSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

-23.60%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.37%

-6.33%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.42%

-0.15%

-15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-12.64%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

2.36%

+7.13%

Volatility

RSSX vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) at 3.10%. This indicates that RSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSXRSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

3.10%

+4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.82%

9.97%

+16.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.81%

13.99%

+17.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

13.68%

+18.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.80%

13.68%

+18.12%

RSSX vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSSX vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

RSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than RSBT's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
2.90%3.20%0.00%2.38%
RSSX
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF
1.52%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSX and RSBT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to RSBT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSX dropped -27.37% vs RSBT's -23.60%.

On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 28.83% vs 28.58% for RSSX. On fees, RSSX is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 28.83% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSX is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.52% for RSSX.

RSSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RSBT is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RSSX and 0.97% for RSBT.

RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSX and RSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer