PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSST vs. RSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSST vs. RSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a 21.45% return, which is significantly higher than RSSX's 1.26% return.


RSST

1D
-0.95%
1M
7.80%
YTD
21.45%
6M
23.86%
1Y
56.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSSX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
1.26%
6M
0.73%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSST vs. RSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSST and RSSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.72

The correlation between RSST and RSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSST vs. RSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSST
RSST Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSX
RSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSST vs. RSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSSTRSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

1.05

+3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.18

3.02

+14.16

RSST vs. RSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the RSSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and RSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSSTRSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

0.90

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.99

-0.04

Drawdowns

RSST vs. RSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than RSSX's maximum drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and RSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSTRSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-27.37%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-27.37%

+15.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-15.42%

+14.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.72%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

9.49%

-6.18%

Volatility

RSST vs. RSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is 4.16%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that RSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSTRSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

7.93%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

26.82%

-11.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

31.81%

-9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

31.80%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

31.80%

-7.64%

RSST vs. RSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSST has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSST vs. RSSX - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than RSSX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSST
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
0.92%1.12%0.09%0.93%
RSSX
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF
1.52%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSST and RSSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to RSST (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSST dropped -30.80% vs RSSX's -27.37%.

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 56.70% vs 28.58% for RSSX. On fees, RSSX is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RSST has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 56.70% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSX is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSST.

RSSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.92% for RSST.

RSST is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for RSST and 0.68% for RSSX.

RSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSST and RSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer